Democracy and human rights

For many years, Western players have been going all out to placate the populistic-nationalist players and their destructive ideologies: yet their questionable methods of appeasement and undemocratic interventions have ended up bolstering the very powers that have come to pose a threat to peace. The way for new excesses of violence has been paved. By supporting firebrands, Russia has been able to expand its influence further – this is the Kremlin’s second front for the destabilisation of Europe.

Democratic values and principles have been under fire in Bosnia and Herzegovina for years, from within and without, a battle between ethnocracy and democracy is being waged in the country at the expense of its citizens.

This essay investigates the effects of contemporary migrations on the constitution of a new epoch of peace, with particular emphasis on the European Union as a desired integrating entity for hundreds of thousands of people uprooted from their hearths.

With this panel, we came to the conclusion that the conditions for changing the Constitution and the Election Law have not been met due to the fact that Bosnia and Herzegovina is in the pre-election year, and that the work of state institutions, including the Parliamentary Assembly of Bosnia and Herzegovina, has been blocked by secessionist forces from the Republika Srpska, while at the same time the Government of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina is de facto in a technical mandate, due to the HDZ obstructions in the establishing the government at that level in accordance with the results of previous elections.

The price tag for entering the political competition in North Macedonia is about to get a lot higher, especially for civic initiatives and independent candidates, with the amendments to the Electoral Code proposed by the government. The amendments, if passed by the Parliament, would require each independent list for the upcoming municipal elections to submit the signatures of at least two percent of the registered voters in the designated municipality, in order for their candidacy to be accepted and for them to be allowed to take part in the elections, planned to be held in October.

Three legal cases/political scandals during 2018-19 grabbed the attention of the domestic public and the international community in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH). The first two concerned the unresolved deaths of two young men, Dženan Memić in Sarajevo and David Dragičević in Banja Luka. The improper investigative conduct of the police and judiciary regarding their deaths raised suspicions of cover-ups and political interference. The third concerned corruption allegations against Milan Tegeltija, then president of the High Judicial and Prosecutorial Council of Bosnia and Herzegovina (HJPC), the BiH judiciary’s self-managing body. The three cases marked the nadir of a steady decline of the rule of law institutions in BiH over the last decade and a half, and stand in stark contrast to 2005 when BiH was a frontrunner among Western Balkan countries aspiring to European Union (EU) membership. Rule of law achievements until then had been the result of substantial and systematic judicial and (to a lesser degree) police reform carried out during the immediate post-war period under the leadership of the international community.

Only when enlightened citizens realize that they have rights and that they can and must use them to change the system for the better, something will change.

Agenda coming ‘in the name of Croats in BiH’ relies almost entirely on the victimology/victorious narrative, with a populist aspiration to preserve the 'nation' endangered by majoritarianism in the Federation BiH.

Ljubo Bešlić has been the Mayor of the City of Mostar since December 2004, so for almost 16 years. It is not known in the history of recent democracy in Europe, probably also the whole world, that someone held an office for so long just because no elections were held. He told Interview.ba that during all those years he intended to resign countless times. But, the question was, he added, to whom to hand over the mandate.